The Sunday Instances and the Mail on Sunday reported the allegations a few “cash-for-honors” deal on the Prince’s Basis final yr, the charity commissioned an impartial investigation, and Mr. Fawcett resigned as its chief govt.
The police stated on Wednesday that they’d sufficient proof to open a proper investigation of whether or not the inspiration violated a 1925 legislation that prohibits the sale of peerages or different royal honors. It’s utilizing the identical unit that’s investigating whether social gatherings at Downing Street violated coronavirus lockdown restrictions.
If Scotland Yard uncovers proof that Charles knew a few potential quid-pro-quo, royal specialists stated, that may pose a grave danger to the 73-year-old inheritor to the throne. Even with out the involvement of Charles, it may forged a harsh highlight on the aggressive strategies of the prince’s lieutenants.
For the 95-year-old queen, the risk to Charles is, in some methods, a fair greater headache than Andrew’s shame. Along with her personal latest well being issues and her Platinum Jubilee celebrations looming, she has been transferring to place the household’s affairs so as. She declared not too long ago, for instance, that when Charles ascends to the throne, his spouse, Camilla, ought to be generally known as queen.
However this week has served as a reminder of her fragility. On Wednesday, when two guests to Windsor Fortress requested her how she was, the queen, smiling and clutching a strolling stick, gestured to her legs, and stated, “Effectively, as you see, I can’t transfer.”
“The clock is ticking,” stated Peter Hunt, a former royal correspondent for the BBC. “They’re desperately attempting to clear the trail for Charles. Now, on that path is abruptly strewn Michael Fawcett.”